This photo (stolen from @OtagoLaw) sums up my LAWS301 jurisprudence paper in 2011. pic.twitter.com/HBPrKN3cOU
— Strictly Obiter (@StrictlyObiter) April 1, 2019
Teachers Disciplinary Tribunal decision recording:
Its oral decision finding serious misconduct.
Its subsequent written decision reversing serious misconduct.
Its even more subsequent written decision deciding it was serious misconduct after all.https://t.co/2aOmVmSumK
— Strictly Obiter (@StrictlyObiter) April 2, 2019
Exemplary!
From Rafiq v Auckland Transport [2018] NZHC 2904: https://t.co/IYvjji7D3T pic.twitter.com/2qSAX22ieU
— Strictly Obiter (@StrictlyObiter) April 2, 2019
Please follow @CourtsofNZ to receive Decisions of Public Interest and Jagose J.
— Strictly Obiter (@StrictlyObiter) April 3, 2019
Provisions of Act passed by Youth Parliament declared inconsistent with NZBORA by Youth High Court.
— Strictly Obiter (@StrictlyObiter) April 3, 2019
Learn to fraud! pic.twitter.com/uJmmL47Nd4
— Strictly Obiter (@StrictlyObiter) April 4, 2019
Seems kinda needy, but sure, I think some High Court judges are interesting. pic.twitter.com/23F0lObf7c
— Strictly Obiter (@StrictlyObiter) April 6, 2019
One of my best days in court was when I had filed written submissions trying to distinguish the only two cases on point, both of which were written by Muir J, only to then get Muir J as the hearing judge. I didn't convince his Honour but he did find it very funny.
— Strictly Obiter (@StrictlyObiter) April 6, 2019
Supreme Court update: Chief Justice Winkelmann begins work with colleagues on Supreme Court, starts to understand why Elias CJ dissented so goddamn much.
— Strictly Obiter (@StrictlyObiter) April 6, 2019
Strictly obiter 